Blindpsot Consistency blog

Navigating the Blindspots of Consistency

Exploring the Blindspots of Consistency in Engineering Teams: Strengths and Strategic Partnerships

What is the Consistency Strength?

People high in the Consistency talent thrive in environments that demand structure and fairness. They naturally seek to establish processes that ensure resources, expectations, and opportunities are distributed equitably. In engineering, this can mean creating standard operating procedures (SOPs), ensuring compliance with safety regulations, or building workflows that avoid favouritism. Their focus on stability and fairness can improve team morale, reduce inefficiencies, and foster a sense of order within the chaos of technical work.

However, strengths overplayed or applied rigidly can create challenges with colleagues, clients or indeed close friends or family. Let’s explore some of the key blind spots of Consistency, particularly in the context of engineering, and identify the CliftonStrengths themes that can serve as valuable partners.

To explore more how to manage your interactions with other CliftonStrengths, read the Katalytik Whitepaper on Conflict and Communication and access our insights to how you can interact more effectively with some CliftonStrengths when you understand their drivers and style.

Blind Spot 1: Resistance to Flexibility in Unique Situations

People with high Consistency prefer structured systems that apply equally to all. While this is invaluable for establishing a sense of fairness, it can lead to a rigid approach when exceptions are necessary. In engineering, where projects often present unique challenges or rapidly changing requirements, an overemphasis on uniformity can stifle creativity and adaptability. For example, a one-size-fits-all approach to problem-solving might overlook the nuances of a particularly complex or urgent issue.

How to Address It:

To overcome this blind spot, individuals with Consistency can seek out teammates with Adaptability or Ideation. Those with Adaptability thrive in dynamic, fast-moving situations and can bring the flexibility needed when processes must bend to fit unique circumstances. Similarly, Ideation talent holders can help brainstorm creative solutions that fit the immediate needs of the problem while maintaining fairness in the broader system. And Strategic as a theme can offer insights and alternative ways of doing things.  

Practical Tip:

When faced with an exception, pause to assess its broader implications. Ask: Does this exception set a dangerous precedent, or is it a rare situation where deviation is justified?

Blind Spot 2: Perceived Lack of Empathy for Individual Needs

Consistency is often focused on the “big picture” of fairness, which can unintentionally overlook the unique circumstances or needs of individuals. In engineering teams, this might manifest as enforcing a rigid work schedule or workflow without fully considering personal challenges, such as someone’s need for flexible hours due to caregiving responsibilities. This perceived lack of empathy can create friction and lead to disengagement.

How to Address It:

Partnering with individuals high in Empathy or Individualisation can help bring a balanced perspective. Find a go to partner to have conversations that can help you explore this. Empathy talent holders are skilled at understanding others’ feelings and perspectives, which can help ensure that fairness doesn’t overshadow compassion. Meanwhile, Individualisation talent holders excel at tailoring solutions to fit the unique strengths and needs of each team member, creating a complementary approach to fairness.

Practical Tip:

Schedule regular one-on-one check-ins with team members to better understand their individual needs and how processes might accommodate them without compromising fairness.

Blind Spot 3: Slow Decision-Making in Ambiguous Situations

Consistency-driven individuals prefer clear rules and processes to guide their decisions. However, engineering projects often involve ambiguity and incomplete data. In such cases, the desire to wait until a system or rule is established can delay critical decision-making. This can frustrate teams that rely on agility and quick thinking, particularly in high-stakes situations like product launches or system failures.

How to Address It:

Partnering with someone high in Command or Activator can help mitigate this blind spot. Command talent holders excel at making decisive choices even in uncertain conditions, while Activators are adept at taking quick action to move projects forward. Together, they can complement Consistency’s preference for structure by bringing energy and urgency to decision-making.

Practical Tip:

When a decision needs to be made quickly, focus on the “minimum viable structure.” Define just enough process to guide the immediate decision without over-complicating or delaying action.

Blind Spot 4: Difficulty Embracing Innovation or Change

Consistency values stability, which can sometimes translate into resistance to change. While maintaining proven processes is often a strength, the fast-paced and evolving nature of engineering demands innovation. Over-reliance on the “way things have always been done” can hinder progress and leave teams lagging behind competitors who are more open to change.

How to Address It:

Team up with individuals who have Futuristic or Strategic talents. Futuristic talent holders are visionaries who can paint an inspiring picture of what the future could look like, helping the team see the benefits of change. Strategic, on the other hand, helps people excel at finding alternative pathways to achieve a goal, ensuring that the shift is both innovative and aligned with long-term objectives.

Practical Tip:

When faced with change, take time to map out how the new process aligns with the team’s core values and priorities. This can provide reassurance while allowing innovation to flourish.

Blind Spot 5: Overemphasis on Rules at the Expense of Relationships

In their pursuit of fairness, a rhythm or routine, people high in Consistency may come across as overly focused on the rules, potentially straining relationships within the team. For example, they might enforce policies in a way that feels impersonal, which can alienate colleagues who value a more relational or collaborative approach.

How to Address It:

Partnering with teammates who lead with Harmony or Relator can provide balance. Harmony talent holders excel at resolving conflict and fostering agreement, while Relator talent holders prioritise building close, genuine relationships. These complementary strengths can ensure that fairness doesn’t come at the cost of connection.

Practical Tip:

When enforcing rules, take time to explain the “why” behind them. Framing policies in terms of their benefit to the team or project can help build buy-in and trust.

Final Thoughts: Leveraging Partnerships to Maximise Consistency

The Consistency talent is a cornerstone of fairness and stability in engineering teams, but it’s not without its challenges. By recognising and addressing its blind spots, individuals with high Consistency can ensure their focus on equality doesn’t inadvertently hinder innovation, adaptability, or empathy.

Strategic partnerships with complementary strengths such as Adaptability, Empathy, Command, and Futuristic can help build a well-rounded approach to engineering challenges. Ultimately, it’s not about changing who you are but about leveraging your strengths in a way that maximises impact while maintaining balance. With thoughtful self-awareness and collaboration, the Consistency strength can help create engineering teams that are not only fair but also highly effective and innovative.